CURRENT BOOK PROJECT

Why Conflicts Become Ethnic

a book project with Alexandra Siegel

Protest scene in Lebanon with demonstrators holding signs and flags. Some signs in Arabic and English, including messages against civil war and calls for national unity. A Lebanese flag is visible among the protesters.
Protest scene in Lebanon with demonstrators holding signs and flags. Some signs in Arabic and English, including messages against civil war and calls for national unity. A Lebanese flag is visible among the protesters.

Fourate Chahal El Rebkaby

Ethnic conflict is often understood as violence between fixed ethnic groups, but constructivist perspectives emphasize that conflict itself can reshape and sharpen ethnic identities. This project develops a new framework for studying the ethnicization of conflict, which we define as a dynamic process through which ethnic identities become more salient and/or new ethnic identities are constructed in the context of conflict. We document when and to what extent ethnicization occurs, identify who and what drives it, and explain why conflicts follow different ethnic trajectories.

This project is supported by a two-year Distinguished Scholar Award from the Harry Frank Guggenheim Foundation.

Central Questions

  • When, and to what extent, do conflicts become ethnicized? How do the magnitude, timing, and persistence of ethnicization vary within and across conflicts?

  • What drives ethnicization? Under what conditions does ethnic identity become more salient, and what role does violence play?

  • Who drives ethnicization, and how does it spread? What is the role of elites relative to masses, and domestic versus transnational actors?

  • Why do conflicts follow different ethnic trajectories? Why does ethnicization intensify and persist in some cases, but fail to take hold or reverse in others?

Our Approach

While ethnicization can unfold in multiple domains, we focus on public discourse as a key site and means of ethnicization. To capture this process, we introduce and validate a new measure—the relative prevalence of ethnic rhetoric in public discourse about conflict—using computational methods applied to large-scale social media data. This allows us to move beyond classifying conflicts as “ethnic” or “non-ethnic” and instead trace when, where, and through whom ethnicization unfolds.

We combine these measures with data on violence, political events, ethnic demography, and online networks to develop and test competing explanations for ethnicization. Comparing these dynamics across Syria, Yemen, Iraq, and Ukraine, we seek to explain why ethnicization intensifies and persists in some conflicts, but fails to take hold or reverses in others.